Bola adalah salah satu bagian dari hidup saya. Bikin senang, sedih, galau, pusing, marah-marah tetapi yang pasti bola bikin saya ketagihan.
Although I had considered buying Thomas Hardy?s novels I ended up putting ?Bleak House? in my bag last Friday. I had really wanted to buy Hardy?s lesser-known novels but when I read the first page of ?Bleak House? I somehow loved it. I thought I had to broaden my reading horizon, meaning that I shouldn?t read only romance novels.
Therefore, I bought ?Bleak House? instead of Hardy?s ?Two on A Tower? or ?Desperate Remedies?. After all, I had completely enjoyed the love story between Helen Graham and Gilbert Markham in ?Tenant of Wildfell Hall? that I thought that day I had to embrace heavier topics. And so my choice was ?Bleak House?.
I didn?t Google what the novel was all about prior to the purchase. I just once heard the title. And it has turned out the novel is indeed super rich. I even can feel the weight of its content upon my brain at the moment. The thing is Dickens puts so many information within a book. You can find a lot of characters carrying different stories in a novel. And each of it signifies serious problems, deep concerns upon social or legal affairs.
And so is ?Bleak House?. As I compose this post, I am still far away from the ending of the book but my brain has complained of receiving too many stories. Thankfully, I told myself to be really patient when it comes to read Dickens? books before buying ?Bleak House? so whenever my heart wanted to stop my brain whispered it then said, ?hi, be patient?.
Apart from the severe themes in ?Bleak House?, I am grateful that, at least for now, the book isn?t as heartbreaking as ?The Old Curiosity Shop?. Hence, I don?t have to deal with a sort of emotional fight while reading the book unlike my experiences with Nell Trent, which is completely sorrowful.
So well, that?s the introduction of my second reading journey with Dickens. I?ll update in this blog what I find, feel and think about ?Bleak House?. Till then, let?s read again!
?Picture source: www.telegraph.co.uk